Legal Opinion
Mares v. Conagra Poultry Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided July 15, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-F-182PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, filed February 11, 1991. It involves the growing issue of the legitimacy of drug testing in the workplace. On April 4, 1991, we notified the parties that the court would be treating the motion as one for summary judgment. Jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332 (West Supp.1991). For the reasons stated below, the motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED.
I
Plaintiff Carmela Mares (“Mares”) was…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Maher v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carmela Mares v. Conagra Poultry Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Santiago v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Parker v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1993
- Benson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Carmela Mares v. Conagra Poultry Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.