Legal Opinion
Russell v. GTE Government Systems Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 23, 2002No. C-3-99-499PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, Chief Judge.
This litigation arises out of Plaintiff Edward Russell’s employment with Defendant GTE Government Systems Corporation (“GTE Government”) to work on a project known as the ATLAS Project in Feltwell, England, beginning on August 21, 1993. 1 Plaintiffs original Complaint named three Defendants: GTE Corporation (“GTE”), GTE Government, and Karen Ulen (“Ulen”), Deputy Program Manager for the ATLAS program. As a result of the filing of Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (Doc. #32) on July 13, 2000, GTE Government is the sole remaining Defendant.
In his Second Amended Complaint,…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Russell v. GTE Government Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Down-Lite International, Inc. v. AltbaierDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020