Legal Opinion

Willard v. Hutson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1963PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an action for malpractice against two physicians in which .the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $40,000 compensatory damages and the defendants have appealed. At the time of the alleged negligent conduct the plaintiff Daniel Willard was an infant eight months old. He was a victim of hemophilia ① and the charges of negligence relate to the act of one of the defendants in retracting the foreskin of the child’s penis, thus causing it to bleed and bringing about the loss of a portion of the organ known as the frenulum, and to the failure of the defendants thereafter to use…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Shields v. County of BuffaloNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Normand v. Thomas Theatre Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Gist v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Feldman v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
  2. Rogers v. Meridian Park HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. McManus v. DonlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Roach v. HockeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Alvarez v. Great Northern Railway CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API