Legal Opinion
United States v. International Business Machines Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 2, 1974No. 69 Civ. 200 (DNE)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDELSTEIN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff has moved pursuant to Rules 26(b), 30(c) and 37(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “for a ruling on the propriety of instructions by counsel for the defendant, upon the depositions of Frank T. Cary, Chairman and Chief Executive of the defendant, and William A. Hartigan, [an] employee of defendant, whereby said deponents *181did not, upon instructions by their counsel which plaintiff deems to be improper, answer questions propounded to said witnesses in the course of their depositions.”
The relief requested by plaintiff is as follows:(1) an order…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Cinema Amusements, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- Kaiser-Frazer Corp. v. Otis & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Hercules Powder Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Martin v. Valley National BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Dart Drug Corp. v. Corning Glass WorksDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1979
- In re Shopping Carts Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Goss v. CrossleyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.