Legal Opinion
Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 22, 1973No. Nos. 71 Civ. 1437, 71 Civ. 2438PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, Chief Judge.
OPINION
Plaintiffs have moved pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order compelling defendant, Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. (Dun & Bradstreet or D&B) to produce for plaintiffs’ inspection “all documents submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in connection with the SEC’s investigation of the financial collapse of the Penn Central Company.” In addition, plaintiffs seek expenses, in-*350eluding attorney's fees, incurred in obtaining this order.
This motion arose during discovery proceedings in the Penn Central Commercial Paper cases.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Mary G. Roebling v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Willard J. Lamorte v. Hon. Walter R. Mansfield, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- In re Hearings Before Committee on Banking & Currency of United States SenateDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Daval Steel Products v. M/V FakredineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Great Am. InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.