Legal Opinion

Kaiser-Frazer Corp. v. Otis & Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 20, 1951PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves to obtain twofold relief, (1) an order vacating a notice by the defendant to take the depositions of members of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission; and (2) vacating a notice by defendant to take the depositions of fourteen persons residing variously in California, New Mexico, Colorado, Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas.

A third motion made by the Securities and Exchange Commission for an order quashing the subpoenas served upon the Commission to appear by the aforementioned persons insofar as they are in the nature of subpoenas duces tecum…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1939

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  2. Horizons Titanium Corporation v. Norton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
  3. Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  4. Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Co. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  5. In the Matter of Surety Association of America, Glendale Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Republic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API