Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Shopping Carts Antitrust Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 9, 1982No. M-21-29-CLB; MDL No. 451-CLBPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

[Discovery]

BRIEANT, District Judge.

These actions were preceded in time by a criminal antitrust action, United States v. Roblin Industries, Inc., 80 Cr. 530, Indictment filed September 4, 1980 (S.D.N.Y.), in which four corporate defendants herein pleaded nolo contendere to an indictment charging price fixing in the shopping cart manufacturing industry. The plaintiffs now seek treble damages in this private civil action. Plaintiffs filed fifty-six joint interrogatories with subparts totaling one hundred ninety-one questions. Defendants filed joint objections to many of these…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  4. Byers v. BurlesonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  5. Eureka Financial Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. California · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API