Legal Opinion
Am. Indian Health & Servs. Corp. v. Kent
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided June 19, 2018No. C081338PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuarte, J.
*776The State Department of Health Care Services and its director (collectively, the Department) appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs on a petition for a writ of mandate. Plaintiffs are 23 federally qualified health centers (FQHC's) and rural health clinics (RHC's) that serve medically underserved populations (the Clinics). ( 42 U.S.C. §§ 254b(a)(1), 1396d(l )(1), (2), 1395x(aa)(2), (4).) The dispute is over coverage for adult dental, chiropractic, and podiatric services the FQHC's and RHC's provided to Medi-Cal patients for a period between 2009 and 2013.
Prior to July 1, 2009, the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- John Doe v. Univ. of S. Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- City of Redondo Beach v. PadillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Doe v. University of Southern Calif.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Johnson v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Law Offices of Gary Kurtz v. Markowitz CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.