Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSB
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 14, 2007No. 05C0454PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ADELMAN, District Judge.
On January 16, 2007, I concluded that defendant violated the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., in several respects. I also concluded that a number of the violations were material as defined in § 1638(f) and 12 C.F.R. § 226.23 and, as a result, extended by three years the time that borrowers aggrieved by such violations had to exercise them right of rescission pursuant to § 1635. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(2), I certified a class of such borrowers, leaving the decision as to whether to actually seek rescission to each individual…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Beach v. Ocwen Federal BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Nancy R. Murray, Plaintiff-Petitioner v. Gmac Mortgage Corporation, Doing Business as ditech.com, Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- In the Matter of Russell E. Sinclair, Sr. And M. Marguerite Sinclair, Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Andrews v. Chevy Chase BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Andrews v. Chevy Chase BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Andrews, Bryan v. Chevy Chase BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008