Legal Opinion
Sadler v. Turner
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 1986No. B010844PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant Karl Sadler (Sadler) appeals from an order of dismissal for failure to amend his complaint following the sustaining of a demurrer interposed by defendants and respondents Rubin M. Turner, individually, and Turner, Gerstenfeld & Wilk, a professional corporation (collectively, Turner).
Because California Rules of Court, rule 325(f) (rule 325(f)) is inconsistent with statutory law, it is invalid, and no notice was required to Sadler of Turner’s motion to dismiss for failure to amend. The trial court properly dismissed Sadler’s action on an ex parte…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Iverson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re Marriage of FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Call v. Los Angeles County General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- In Re Marriage of LuskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Oppenheimer v. DeutchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3Cited by11 opinions
- California Court Reporters Ass'n v. Judicial CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Caldwell v. Samuels JewelersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. Superior Court (Williams)California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Gitmed v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Wilburn v. Oakland HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.