Legal Opinion

California Court Reporters Ass'n v. Judicial Council

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1995No. A066471PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

Effective in 1994, the Judicial Council promulgated rules of court allowing electronic recording of superior court proceedings, despite a statutory scheme authorizing official shorthand reporting of these proceedings and the Legislature’s rejection of legislation authorizing electronic recording. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rules 33(e), 891, 892, 980.3.) As rules of court are only valid to the extent that they comply with the constitutional charge to be “not inconsistent with statute,” we conclude that these rules were promulgated in excess of Judicial Council authority. (See…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. Pedro T.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Cooper v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Quarterman v. KefauverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Trans-Action Commercial Investors, Ltd. v. Firmaterr, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. City of Oakland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. People v. TingcungcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API