Legal Opinion
Iverson v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 1985No. G002475PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TROTTER, P. J.
Petitioners seek a peremptory writ of mandate directing the superior court to vacate its order granting real party in interest’s motion to quash service of summons. We are asked to determine whether a local superior court rule (Orange County Superior Court Law and Motion Rules, rule 520, subd. (C)(2)) and California Rules of Court, rule 317(a) dealing with the time allowed for filing papers in opposition to a written motion are inconsistent with Code of Civil Procedure section 1005. We find they are and thus do not have the force of law. We therefore issue the writ.
Petitio…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Kapitanski v. Von's Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- St. Vincent Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mamika v. BarcaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- California Court Reporters Ass'n v. Judicial CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Caldwell v. Samuels JewelersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Trans-Action Commercial Investors, Ltd. v. Firmaterr, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Kalivas v. Barry Controls Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.