Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Fink

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1976No. Civ. 44716PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FILES, P. J.

The husband commenced this proceeding on January 10, 1972, with a petition for dissolution of his 31-year marriage. Husband moved for a separate and early trial of the dissolution issue, stating that reconciliation was not possible, that the dissolution hearing would be brief, and that the other issues (ascertainment and division of community property, spousal support and attorney fees) would require a long trial preceded by extensive discovery. On March 12, 1974, the trial court granted husband’s motion to bifurcate, and, after a hearing on March 21, 1974, granted an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hudson v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Harrold v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Hull v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Marriage of FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Eben-King v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Mueller v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. In Re Marriage of Van SickleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API