Legal Opinion
Oppenheimer v. Deutchman
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 3, 1955No. Civ. A. 8638PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwain, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal with prejudice and from the order taxing costs.
The action was originally brought in the Municipal Court of San Antonio Judicial District. A motion for change of venue to the Municipal Court of Beverly Hills Judicial District was granted. Plaintiff appealed from that order. Pending that appeal, the case was transferred, and the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint was sustained with 10 days to amend. The plaintiff, though duly notified of that order, did not amend the complaint, and, on ex parte motion of the defendant, the action was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Bohn v. BohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Cunha v. Anglo California National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Saddlemire v. Stockton Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Matteson v. KlumpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ensher v. Ensher, Alexander & Barsoom, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Gitmed v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Sadler v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Wilburn v. Oakland HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Legg v. United Benefit Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.