Legal Opinion

Walker v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 21, 1997No. C7-97-649PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant insurance company challenges a summary judgment declaring that it was required to defend respondent in an action brought against him on his alleged guaranty on a loan to his son. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

It is not disputed that Walter Walker, son of respondent Stuart Walker, forged his father’s signature on a revolving loan guarantee. Walter Walker later defaulted on a promissory note related to the guaranteed loan, and the bank sued Stuart Walker to recover the unpaid principal and interest. Stuart Walker (hereafter “insured”) tendered the defense to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  3. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Board of Regents v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. WrightDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
  3. Tower Insurance Co. v. Minnesota Holstein-Freisan Breeders' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. KammererDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
  5. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Earthsoils, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API