Legal Opinion
Tower Insurance Co. v. Minnesota Holstein-Freisan Breeders' Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 22, 2000No. C2-99-1003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge
Appellant insurance company challenges a judgment requiring it to indemnify its insured for a liability arising from the insured’s negligent brokering services. We reverse.
FACTS
Richard and Cathy Radel sought from respondent, the Minnesota Holstein-Frei-san Breeders’ Association (the Association), assistance in locating a dairy herd suitable for purchase. The Association routinely brings together buyers and sellers of dairy cattle, charging a commission for its services. In September 1992, an agent of the Association recommended to the Radels that they purchase a dairy herd…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Bor-Son Building Corp. v. Employers Commercial Union Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Esicorp, Inc. St. Louis Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Fallon McElligott, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurnce Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- ESICORP v. Liberty Mutual Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001