Legal Opinion
Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 17, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-8; Court 04-00568PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion & Order
CARMAN, Judge:
This case comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on the Agency Record. Plaintiffs, Wheatland Tube Company and Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation, contest the treatment accorded certain duty drawback adjustments and § 201 duties 1 by the United States Department of Commerce (“Defendant” or “Commerce”) in Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand (“Final Results”), 69 Fed.Reg. 61,649 (Dep’t Commerce Oct. 20, 2004) (final results). Based upon the reasons that follow, the Court finds for Plaintiffs in part and Defendant in part and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Eregli Demir Ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- EregLi Demir Ve çElik Fabrikalari v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.