Legal Opinion

Eregli Demir Ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 22, 2018No. Consol. Court No. 16–00218; Slip Op. 18–27PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnett, Judge:

*1303Plaintiff Eregli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikalari T.A.S. ("Erdemir") and Consolidated Plaintiffs Çolakoglu Metalurji A.S. and Çolakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S. (together, "Çolakoglu") (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), move, pursuant to United States Court of International Trade ("USCIT" or "CIT") Rule 56.2, for judgment on the agency record, challenging the United States Department of Commerce's ("Commerce" or the "agency") final results in the sales at less than fair value investigation of certain hot-rolled steel flat products from the Republic of Turkey.1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat…

2Cases cited40 opinions

Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

Nat'l Nail Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
EregLi Demir Ve çElik Fabrikalari v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane Ve Ulasim Sanayi, A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.