Legal Opinion

Royat v. Roberts

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1951No. Civ. 8032PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that appellants have accepted the benefits of the judgment entered in their favor. Thi§ requires an analysis of the pleadings, findings and judgment.

The appellants brought this action to recover possession of a tractor, and for damages resulting from the unlawful detention of said tractor by the defendants. Defendant Bank of America by its answer denied that appellants were entitled to the possession of the tractor; denied that it had taken possession of the property; and alleged that the tractor was “subject to a chattel mortgage dated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schubert v. ReichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Estate of HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Harrold v. HarroldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Maxwell Hardware Co. v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Browning v. BrowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mathys v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Heacock v. Ivorette-Texas, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Royat v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API