Lala v. Maiorana
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Plaintiffs instituted this action to secure a judicial declaration that they were the owners, as joint tenants, of certain improved real property free and clear of all claims and liens asserted by the defendants. A disclaimer was filed by defendants, the Maioranas, to whom plaintiffs had conveyed the subject property, after their failure to plead to the complaint. Defendants State of California and Division of Labor Law Enforcement answered, admitting the transfer to the Maioranas and setting forth the amount and nature of their liens against the property as creditors of the Maioranas. An…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Torrez v. Torrez (In Re Torrez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- City of Rancho Cucamonga v. Regional Water Quality Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Currie v. StolowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Homami v. IranzadiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Smith v. SimmonsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.