Legal Opinion

McGowan v. Lockwood Corp.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1994No. S-92-634PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Richard D. McGowan, who was injured in an accident during the course of his employment with defendant Lockwood Corporation, claims that a majority of the three-judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court failed to award him all of the workers’ compensation benefits to which he is entitled. Defendant The Hartford was Lockwood’s insurance carrier at the time McGowan was injured.

The Nebraska Court of Appeals affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Court’s ruling on the issues raised in McGowan’s petition for further review. We granted further review on those issues.

We reverse on the issue of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lange Industries, Inc. v. Hallam Grain Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Osteen v. A. C. & S., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Sidel v. Travelers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Yager v. Bellco MidwestNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cords v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kerkman v. Weidner Williams Roofing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hull v. Aetna InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Berggren v. Grand Island Accessories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API