Legal Opinion

Mendoza v. Omaha Meat Processors

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1987No. 86-558PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

Tower Insurance Company (Tower) appeals the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court award to Margarita Mendoza (Mendoza), an employee of Omaha Meat Processors (OMP). Mendoza cross-appeals from denial of an attorney fee and an additional payment of 50 percent for waiting time involving delinquent payment of compensation. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-125 (Reissue 1984). We affirm in part and in part reverse and remand with direction.

BASIS OF CLAIM

OMP employed Mendoza as a “meatcutter,” which involved cutting pieces of meat weighing “60... up to 80 pounds.” While a carcass is being moved on a conveyor…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Osteen v. A. C. & S., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Smith v. Fremont Contract Carriers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lynn v. METROPOLITAN UTILITIES DISTRICTNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Caradori v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Eiting v. GoddingNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Heiliger v. Walters & Heiliger Electric, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemical Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Day v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Zeller v. County of HowardNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API