Legal Opinion
Naftzger v. Naftzger & Kuhe, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 4, 1992No. 9853PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment rendered on December 18, 1990, by the trial court in accordance with an attorney trial referee’s report. The attorney trial referee found that the defendants had waived the arbitration clause in the agreement with the plaintiff by failing to seek enforcement of the clause until the end of the hearing before the attorney trial referee. He further found that the defendant H. James Kuhe had defaulted under a modification of a promissory note and recommended that judgment enter in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $135,267.66 plus costs. In this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Krattenstein v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Hanover Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tarka v. FilipovicConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Banks Building Co. v. Malanga Family Real Estate Holding, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Nielsen v. WisniewskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Capozzi v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Diefenbaugh v. RachowNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.