Diefenbaugh v. Rachow
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanphier, J.
This is an action for the collection of two debts. The first cause of action is based on an unsecured, written promissory note. The second regards plaintiffs’ attempt to recover a deficiency judgment for the balance due on a secured note after repossession of the collateral. The district court found plaintiffs were entitled to enforce the unsecured promissory note, but defendants were entitled to a partial setoff against plaintiffs’ claims. The district court dismissed the cause of action for the alleged deficiency due on the secured note because of plaintiffs’ failure to give defendants…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hanover Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Nelson v. Monarch Investment Plan of Henderson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. WollgastCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Ruwe v. Farmers Mutual United Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Western National Bank of Casper v. HarrisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bradley v. HopkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Bakody Homes & Development, Inc. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- First Westside Bank v. For-Med, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Gibb v. StricklandNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Gies v. City of GeringNebraska Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.