Legal Opinion
E.M. v. Millville Board of Education
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 28, 1994No. Civ. 93-3558PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROTMAN, District Judge:
Presently before the court are plaintiffs’ motion, 1 and defendant’s cross-motion, for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motion is granted, and defendant’s motion is denied.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
L.M., an autistic student, attended kindergarten from 1991-92 and “transitional” first grade classes at Reich School from 1992-93 in the Millville School District (“District”). On May 20, 1993, during an Individualized Educational Placement Conference (“IEP”) with L.M.’s mother, E.M., the District proposed transferring L.M. to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Barlow-Gresham Union High School District No. 2 v. Wesley Mitchell, Individually, and Bari Mitchell and Michael Mitchell, His ParentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Field v. Haddonfield Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Shelly C., B/n/f Mr. And Mrs. Shelbie C. v. Venus Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- D.R., by His Parents and Guardians M.R. And B.R. v. East Brunswick Bd. Of Educ.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Smith v. RoherDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Electric Man, Inc. v. CharosSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Bd. of Educ. of Frederick County v. IS Ex Rel. SummersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- B.K. v. Toms River Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.