Legal Opinion
D.R., by His Parents and Guardians M.R. And B.R. v. East Brunswick Bd. Of Educ.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 26, 1997No. 95-5634PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
This action was brought before the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“the IDEA” or “the Act”), 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq. It raises an important question regarding the enforceability of settlement agreements made be*898tween parents and school boards with the intent of enforcing the IDEA. On appeal, the East Brunswick Board of Education (“the Board”) challenges the district, court’s order granting summary judgment against it. The district court held the Board liable for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pennsylvania Coal Association, an Unincorporated Association v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States Department of Interior Robert Uram, Director, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, United States Department of Interior, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources (Der), Intervenor in D.C. Pennsylvania Coal Association, an Unincorporated Association v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States Department of Interior Robert Uram, Director, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, United States Department of Interior Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources (Der), Intervenor in D.C. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- W.B. v. MatulaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E., as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant Mary E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant, Defendants/third-Party v. Frederick Stokley, Superintendent John Campion, Director of Special Programs Charles Abate, Principal William Ward, Principal Lorraine Zak, Psychologist Kathleen McNally Social Worker Caroline Janover, Ldt-C George Neville, Principal Henry Hogue, Psychologist June Ann Dibb, Dr., Psychiatrist Joan Christian, Ldt-C Susan Lynaugh, Psychologist, Third-Party N.E., as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant Mary E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an InfantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- S.H., Individually and on Behalf of I.H. v. State-Operated School District of the City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Ehrheart v. Verizon WirelessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- T.B. ex rel. Brenneise v. San Diego Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Rebecca H. Holmes v. Millcreek Township School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.