Legal Opinion
B.K. v. Toms River Board of Education
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 30, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-1429(MLC)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COOPER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment by plaintiff, B.K. and defendant, Toms River Board of Education (“Toms River” or “the Board”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff seeks attorneys’ fees, expert fees and other costs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1415(e)(4)(B), as amended, 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(3)(B) (Supp. 1997). 1 For the reasons expressed in this Memorandum Opinion, plaintiffs motion is denied without prejudice and defendant’s motion is granted in…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rebecca H. Holmes v. Millcreek Township School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Akinseye v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Armstrong v. VanceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Pazik v. Gateway Regional School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Department of Health Care Services v. Office of Administrative HearingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.