Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Pizza v. Rezcallah
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1998No. Nos. 96-1894, 96-1895 and 96-1897PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
In each of the three cases before us a non-owner resident was arrested for conduct that violated felony drug laws while occupying residential property owned by one of the appellees herein. In all three cases, it is undisputed that the appellee property owners neither acquiesced to nor participated in the drug activities that took place on their property. Further, the record indicates that all three owners acted in good faith, taking affirmative action to investigate allegations and to remove the offending residents upon discovering the illegal activity. The state nonetheless filed a Complaint…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Wymsylo v. Bartec, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
- Hydrofarm, Inc. v. OrendorffOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Sogg v. ZurzOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Connor Group v. RaneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.