Procter Gamble Company v. Stoneham
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hildebrandt, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, the Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”), appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing its claims against defendant-appellee, Paul Stoneham, for breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets. P&G sought damages and injunctive relief against Stoneham, claiming that he had violated a non-compete agreement that he had signed while employed at P&G and that he had misappropriated trade secrets when he began working for a company called Alberto-Culver. The case was tried to a judge.
Upon Stoneham’s motion, the trial court dismissed…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Raimonde v. Van VlerahOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Pepsico, Inc., a Corporation v. William E. Redmond, Jr., and the Quaker Oats Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Rogers v. Runfola & Associates, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Levine v. BeckmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Patio Enclosures, Inc. v. HerbstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Chicago Title Insurance v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- UZ Engineered Products Co. v. Midwest Motor Supply Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Davis v. WidmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.