Legal Opinion

Hydrofarm, Inc. v. Orendorff

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 2008No. 08AP-287PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petree, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant and cross-appellee, Phil Orendorff (“Orendorff’ or “defendant”), appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, which enjoined defendant from employment with a competitor of plaintiffappellee and cross-appellant, Hydrofarm, Inc. (“plaintiff’ or “Hydrofarm”) for six months and from disclosing plaintiffs confidential information or trade secrets for six months. Hydrofarm cross-appeals. Because the trial court abused its discretion by enjoining defendant from employment with a former employer’s competitor in the absence of a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Pepsico, Inc., a Corporation v. William E. Redmond, Jr., and the Quaker Oats Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Garono v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mp Totalcare Services, Inc. v. MattimoeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  2. State ex rel. Bowling v. DeWineOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Columbus v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Mcgowan & Co. v. BoganDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API