Hydrofarm, Inc. v. Orendorff
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Petree, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant and cross-appellee, Phil Orendorff (“Orendorff’ or “defendant”), appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, which enjoined defendant from employment with a competitor of plaintiffappellee and cross-appellant, Hydrofarm, Inc. (“plaintiff’ or “Hydrofarm”) for six months and from disclosing plaintiffs confidential information or trade secrets for six months. Hydrofarm cross-appeals. Because the trial court abused its discretion by enjoining defendant from employment with a former employer’s competitor in the absence of a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Pepsico, Inc., a Corporation v. William E. Redmond, Jr., and the Quaker Oats Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Garono v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mp Totalcare Services, Inc. v. MattimoeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- State ex rel. Bowling v. DeWineOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Columbus v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Mcgowan & Co. v. BoganDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.