Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Flanary
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 22, 1994No. 18898PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY, Judge.
State Farm appeals from a judgment that declared it had a legal obligation to defend a suit brought by Allen Broeckelman against Thomas Flanary, State Farm’s insured, and to provide Flanary liability coverage under an insurance policy it issued to him covering a 1978 Chevrolet pickup. Broeckelman’s suit alleged that he was injured when part of a boom collapsed and fell on him. He claimed that Flanary negligently constructed a boom extension on a crane and that his injuries resulted therefrom.
State Farm’s only point relied on contends the judgment erroneously declared or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Schmidt v. Utilities Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Schmidt v. LuchterhandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Steelman v. HolfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lancer Insurance Co. v. Garcia Holiday ToursTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Sexton v. Omaha Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. EssweinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Central City Ltd. Partnership v. United Postal Savings Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Walden v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.