Schmidt v. Luchterhand
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
This appeal presents the following issues:
1. Whether the American Family Mutual Insurance Company’s policy afforded coverage to this incident?
2. Whether Threshermen’s Mutual Insurance Company’s policy afforded coverage to this incident?
3. Is the issue of waiver and estoppel properly before this court on this appeal ?
American Family policy.
On this appeal, American takes the position that their policy of insurance did not cover the use of the hoist at the time of the accident.
In 1967, Luchterhand purchased a business from Gary Rogenbach, the nature of which was erecting and servicing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McPhee v. American Motorists InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Inter-Insurance Exchange of Chicago Motor Club v. Westchester Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Smedley v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Neumann v. Wisconsin Natural Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Charette v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Doyle v. EngelkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- ESTATE OF SUSTACHE v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- American Motorists Insurance v. Trane Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.