Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Esswein

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 2001No. ED 72990PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES R. DOWD, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Chrysler Insurance Company (“Chrysler”) appeals from a declaratory judgment, because it declared that the coverage provided by Chrysler under its Dealer Daily Rent-A-Car insurance policy issued to Chrysler Credit Corporation was primary and had no limits of liability with respect to an accident involving a vehicle rented by Mrs. Glennetta Esswein from King Auto Leasing (“King Auto Leasing”). Reversed and rendered.

PACTS

On March 3, 1993, Mrs. Esswein rented a van from King Auto Leasing in St. Louis, Missouri. She signed a standard form rental…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Home Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Krombach v. Mayflower Ins. Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Peters v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Butler v. Mitchell-Hugeback, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  5. Kansas City v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Baier v. Darden RestaurantsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Steve Hibbs v. Brian BergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Alea London Ltd. v. Bono-Soltysiak EnterprisesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Eveland v. EvelandMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Ince v. Money's Building & Development, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API