Legal Opinion
C. E. Niehoff & Co., a Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 21, 1957No. 11526_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner, sometimes referred to herein as Niehoff, asks us to review an order to cease and desist issued by the respondent, sometimes referred to herein as the commission, upon a complaint charging violation of section 2(a) of the amended Clayton Act.1
The complaint charges that Niehoff, in its nationwide sale of automotive ignition and hydraulic brake parts to automotive jobbers competitively engaged in *39the resale of such products, discriminates in price between its small quantity purchasers and its large quantity purchasers, and that the effect thereof may be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- E. Edelmann & Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Whitaker Cable Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
3Cited by15 opinions
- Moog Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- New Jersey Wood Finishing Company v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, and Essexwire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Purolator Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Standard Motor Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- American Motor Specialties Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.