Legal Opinion
New Jersey Wood Finishing Company v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, and Essexwire Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 20, 1964No. 14487_1PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MCLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) from a denial of a defense motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations.
Plaintiff-appellee is the New Jersey Wood Finishing Company (N. J. Wood), ■a New Jersey corporation engaged in the manufacture of certain electrical insulation products. Defendant-appellant is the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M), a Delaware Corporation, doing business in New Jersey and likewise engaged in the electrical insulation field.
On June 24, 1960, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) had issued a complaint…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Gladys G. Holloway v. Bristol-Myers CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Dorothy Carlson v. The Coca-Cola Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Glendenning Companies, Inc., a Connecticut CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.