Legal Opinion

United States v. Haye

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided February 3, 1988No. ACM 25873PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MURDOCK, Judge:

A general court-martial with members found the appellant guilty of two specifications of adultery and one specification of fraternization. The military judge set aside the guilty finding of one specification alleging adultery because it was multiplicious with the fraternization specification. The appellant was sentenced to dismissal and total forfeitures. Because she did not receive any confinement, the convening authority reduced the forfeitures to $848 per month for twelve months. R.C.M. 1107(d)(2), Discussion. The appellant has asserted nine assignments of error. We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. United States v. KozakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. HayeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. SpenceU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. KordaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. ChickU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. PeoplesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API