Legal Opinion
Nardone v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 11, 1939No. 240PublishedCited by 1,869 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
We are called upon for the second time to review affirmance by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit of petitioners’ convictions under an indictment for frauds on the revenue. In Nardone v. United States, 302 U. S. 379, this Court reversed the convictions on the first trial because, they were procured by evidence secured in violation of § 605 of the Communications Act of 1934 (c. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, 1103; 47 U. S. C., § 605). For details of the' facts reference is made to that case. Suffice it here to say that this evidence consisted of intercepted telephone messages,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. NardoneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
3Cited by1,869 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
1,864 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.