United States v. Korda
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES, Judge:
Airman First Class Korda was convicted of desertion.1 The principal evidence of the required intent to remain away from his place of duty permanently was a note that was found in Airman Korda’s apartment. On appeal, Airman Korda argues that the military judge erred when he denied the defense motion to suppress the note. We disagree and affirm the findings and sentence.
I. FACTS
We adopt the following findings of fact entered by the military judge:
One. On 15 May 1991, the accused, Airman Korda, failed to report for work ... at Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Russo v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Michigan v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. PabonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. CurryNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
- United States v. FittenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. McCALLNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2021
- United States v. McCALLNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2021