Legal Opinion
Millyard v. Faus
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 1968No. Civ. 32239PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NUTTER, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of the defendants and respondents L. C. Faus and Mary G. Faus and Lambert S. Whitcomb in plaintiffs’ action to quiet title to real property of three parcels of land which were formerly burdened with an easement for railroad purposes.
Appellants Carl E. Millyard and Arleen E. Millyard are the owners of a parcel of land in the City of Glendora, County of Los Angeles, which was acquired by a deed dated March 16, 1953, describing the land by metes and bounds, with dimensions of 75 feet along Michigan Avenue and 140…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Berton v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1917
- City of Redlands v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Kunza v. GaskellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Chao v. the Richey Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- BEWLEY v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026