Legal Opinion
TINNES v. Brand
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 2008No. 28250PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL E. SCOTT, Judge.
This appeal involves a roadway known as Corewood Lane. It runs through property owned by Victor and Deanna Tinnes from 1977-96; by their daughter and son-in-law (“the Ebys”) from 1996-2002; and since 2002 by respondents (“defendants”). The Tinneses ran a lakefront resort on the property. Corewood Lane (then called “0010C”) was the access road through their property to the resort site and lakefront. When the Tinneses sold the resort to the Ebys in 1996, they retained four acres on the property’s north side. They built a home there, where they still live, and a driveway…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whittom v. Alexander-Richardson PartnershipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Connell v. Jersey Realty & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Shapiro Bros., Inc. v. Jones-Festus Properties, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Vecchiotti v. TegethoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Kelley v. Kelly Residential Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bateman v. Platte CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- DAVID ROMANO v. MIKE R. & CARLA ADAMSMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
- Koch v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- MARK BECKMANN, CHERYL BECKMANN, WILLIAM ANGELL, SHERRY ANGELL, MARK EDGECOMB, MIKE EDGECOMB, GARY GARNER, KATHY GARDNER, TOM RUTLEDGE, TARA RUTLEDGE, JERRY MAIER, BRENDA MAIER, MARK HAUPT, PAMELA HAUPT, JEFFREY ALAN PORTER, and JODY PORTER, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants/Appellants v. JOY PHILLIPS and DANIEL JOSEPH GARDNER, Defendants/Counterclaimants/RespondentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024