Legal Opinion

McShane v. City of Moberly

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from, Moberly Court of Common Pleas. — Hon. Geo. H. Burckhartt, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Philips, C.

This is an action of ejectment, brought by McShane, respondent, against the city of Moberly, to recover possession of a tract of land claimed by defendant to be a xiublic street in one of the additions to said town.

The case was tried on the following agreed statement of facts: (1) That the abstract of title hereto attached and marked “A,” is a correct exxiosition to the title in controversy. (2) That the property in controversy is a street, as shown, of Burkholders’s second addition to Moberly and W. W. and J. P. Porter’s addition to Moberly, filed for record Eebruary 1st, 1873,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Irwin v. DixionSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Bales v. PerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Brinck v. CollierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  4. Landis v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Funkhouser v. LaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Greisinger v. KlinhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Cincinnati, Richmond & Fort Wayne Railroad v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Johnson v. FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Golden v. City of ClintonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Zoll v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API