Legal Opinion
A.S. GOLDMEN & COMPANY, INC. v. NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 7, 1999No. 97-5618PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge.
This ease raises a dormant commerce clause challenge to one aspect of the New Jersey Uniform Securities Law. The appel-lee, A.S. Goldmen & Co., Inc. (“Goldmen”), claims that N.J.S.A. § 49:3-60 (“ § 60”) violates the dormant commerce clause insofar as it authorizes the appellant New Jersey Bureau of Securities to prevent Goldmen from selling securities from New Jersey to buyers in other states where purchase of the securities was authorized by state regulators. The district court agreed, and granted summary judgment in favor of Goldmen. We hold that §…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Dean Foods Company v. Ben Brancel, Secretary of the Wisconsin Dept. Of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Jurista v. Amerinox Processing, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Freeman v. CorzineCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- TitleMax of Delaware Inc v. Robin WeissmannCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Bronco Wine Co. v. JollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.