Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Corzine

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 17, 2010No. 99-1678PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

POLLAK, District Judge.

Plaintiffs — two New Jersey wine enthusiasts, a New Jersey couple who seeks access to more Kosher wines, and a California winery — have brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Jeory Fischer, New Jersey’s Director of Alcoholic Beverage Control, alleging that several aspects of New Jersey’s Alcoholic Beverage Control Law (“ABC Law”) infringe on the dormant Commerce Clause in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

I

New Jersey law, like the laws of many states, establishes a “three-tier” structure for alcohol…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. TRI-M GROUP, LLC v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. Minard Run Oil Co. v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. Michelle Lane v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  4. Heffner v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  5. Adam Potter v. Cozen & O'ConnorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API