Legal Opinion
Bronco Wine Co. v. Jolly
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 20, 2005No. C037254PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
Bronco Wine Company and Barrel Ten Quarter Circle, Inc. (collectively Bronco) filed a petition for writ of mandate, invoking our original jurisdiction. It seeks declaratory and injunctive relief barring application of the labeling requirements of Business and Professions Code section 25241 to wines produced by Bronco that are destined for interstate commerce because the section is in conflict with Bronco’s federally approved certificates of label approval (COLA).
Bronco possesses COLA’s for the brand names “Napa Ridge,” “Rutherford Vintners,” and “Napa Creek Winery,”…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Brady v. Bayer Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Allegretti & Co. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Hess Collection Winery v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.