Legal Opinion
Winkler v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 23, 1956No. Civ. 21344, 21282PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE (Paul), J. pro tem. *
The appellants, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, a partnership, and Sidney B. Garfield, appeal from a judgment of the lower court, based upon the verdict of a jury, awarding plaintiffs the sum of $20,000 for injuries alleged to have been suffered by the respondent Mabel Winkler through the alleged negligence of the defendants, their agents, and employees. They also appeal from the order denying their motions for judgments notwithstanding the verdicts. Plaintiffs appeal from that portion of the judgment upon the verdict which was against them and in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Costa v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Will v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Agnew v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Eckleberry v. Kaiser Foundation Northern HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- DeVault v. LoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Tell v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Bird v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.