Legal Opinion

Costa v. Regents of University of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1953No. Civ. 14776PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

This cause was before us on a prior occasion in which we entered judgment of affirmance (Cal.App.) 247 P.2d 21. Thereafter the Supreme Court filed its opinion in Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., 39 Cal.2d 436 [247 P.2d 344], treating the subject of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine. For that reason this court granted a rehearing for the express purpose of having further argument on the question of the application of that doctrine to this case.

In a reexamination of the record in the light of the Zentz case we are satisfied that the judgment must be reversed on that ground. All the other points…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Oliveros v. AbréuSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1973
  5. Laughlin v. ForgraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API