Costa v. Regents of University of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
This cause was before us on a prior occasion in which we entered judgment of affirmance (Cal.App.) 247 P.2d 21. Thereafter the Supreme Court filed its opinion in Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., 39 Cal.2d 436 [247 P.2d 344], treating the subject of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine. For that reason this court granted a rehearing for the express purpose of having further argument on the question of the application of that doctrine to this case.
In a reexamination of the record in the light of the Zentz case we are satisfied that the judgment must be reversed on that ground. All the other points…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Oliveros v. AbréuSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1973
- Laughlin v. ForgraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.