Legal Opinion
Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 29, 1983No. CV 81-1519-CHHPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, District Judge.
The following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are entered in support of the Court’s grant of partial summary judgment to defendant on the Fifth Cause of Action alleging violations of section 1 of the Sherman Act.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Plaintiff Golden State Transit Corporation is engaged in the business of operating taxicab service in the City of Los Angeles, California. Defendant City of Los Angeles (the “City”) is a municipal corporation formed under the laws of the State of Cali- ■ fornia. Ordinances enacted by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Community Communications Co. v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nicholas Kassbaum, AKA Nick St. Nicholas v. Steppenwolf Productions, Inc. Steppenwolf, Inc. Joachim Fritz Kreudeldat, AKA John KayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Golden State Transit Corporation v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Golden State Transit Corporation a California Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.