Legal Opinion

Golden State Transit Corporation a California Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1985No. CA 83-6441PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*831FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

Golden State Transit purchased the assets of the bankrupt Yellow Cab Company in 1977 and the City thereafter approved the transfer of Yellow Cab’s franchise. On March 31, 1980, Golden State made a timely application for renewal of its taxicab franchise to become effective upon its expiration on March 31, 1981. The City’s Department of Transportation reported that Golden State was in full compliance with all of the terms and conditions of its franchise. Acting on this report, the Board of Transportation Commissioners recommended approval of the franchise renewal to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. City of Angoon v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Local 560 (i.b.t.), Nominal (Intervenor), in No. 91-5440, and Michael Sciarra Joseph Sheridan, Michael Sciarra, in No. 91-5441Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Yusuf v. Hamed ex rel. HamedSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  5. William G. Wilcox, D.O., P.C. Employees' Defined Benefit Pension Trust and William G. Wilcox, D.O., P.C., and Counterclaim (88-1008) v. United States of America, and Counterclaim v. Rubenstein, Isaacs, Bordman & Lax Corporation, Counterclaim Lowell R. Stuckman, Intervenor-Appellant (88-2194)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API