Ray D. Lillibridge, Inc. v. Johnson Bronze Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.
The question here presented is the familiar one as to whether the defendant, a foreign corporation, can be said to be doing business in this State so as to be subject, in an action by *574another foreign corporation, to the service of process by service upon an al eged managing agent. (See Civ. Prac. Act, § 229, subd. 3; Gen. Corp. Law, § 47, subd. 4, as added by Laws of 1920, chap. 916.) Service was made upon one Edward Laterman, who is alleged to be a managing agent of the defendant. The facts show that Laterman was engaged in'business soliciting orders for the products of several companies,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Robert Dollar Co. v. Canadian Car & Foundry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Miller v. Surf Properties, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Siegel v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Long Island, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Young v. BragaliniNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Ciprari v. Servicos Aereos Cruzeiro Do Sul, SA (Cruzeiro)District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.