Legal Opinion

Tatson, LLC, d/b/a Powerhouse Gym of Joplin v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 24, 2015No. SC94260PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMary R. Russell, Chief Justice

The Department of Revenue (DOR) seeks review of the Administrative Hearing Commission’s (AHC) determination that Tatson, LLC, d/b/a Powerhouse Gym of Joplin (Powerhouse) did not owe sales tax on rental fees it collected from a personal training company, Atlanta Fitness, d/b/a Custom Built (Custom Built). The rental fees covered the lease of office space and the opportunity to market and sell personal training services to Powerhouse members. DOR contends that the rental fees were subject to sales tax as a fee paid to a place of recreation under section 144.020.1(2). 1

This Court finds that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis R. Conway and Sheri D. Conway v. CitiMortgage, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. L & R Distributing, Inc. v. Missouri Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. Wilson's Total Fitness Center, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  4. Loren Cook Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. Michael Jaudes Fitness Edge, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bartlett International, Inc., and Bartlett Grain Co., L.P. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API